Neurocompute Narrative Velocity Map
NEUROCOMPUTE VISUAL SYSTEM

Open the Narrative
Velocity Map

Explore the Parkinson’s research intelligence diagram before entering the Neurocompute platform.

NC
Neurocompute
AI Parkinson’s Intelligence Terminal
RESEARCH PAPER

Frontotemporal dementia: does structural MRI-based clustering match clinical syndromes?

PMID
42164430
Journal
Frontiers in neuroscience
Publication Date
2026-01-01
Grade
U

AI Summary

Why It Matters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Frontotemporal dementia is an umbrella term that encompasses several clinical syndromes with impaired behavioral, language, and motor functions. These syndromes show considerable overlap in clinical features and imaging patterns. Therefore, there is a need to investigate the syndromic heterogeneity in FTD using unbiased data-driven approaches. METHODS: We used data-driven clustering analysis of structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data on 400 patients with clinical FTD diagnoses [behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), right temporal variant of frontotemporal dementia (rtvFTD), apraxia of speech with agrammatic aphasia (AOS-PAA), primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal syndrome (CBS) and primary progressive aphasia who did not fit into the other diagnostic categories (PPA-other)]. MR images were w-scored relative to cognitively unimpaired individuals, and principal component analysis was performed. A clustering ensemble approach, including hierarchical algorithms, was applied to the MR-based principal components, and imaging and clinical characteristics of the clusters were investigated. Various numbers of clusters (K = 2, 3, or 4) were evaluated. RESULTS: The K = 3 solution offered the most clinically meaningful separation of FTD syndromes. The first cluster captured mostly frontal MRI abnormalities related to the speech, language and behavioral clinical dimensions, including patients with AOS-PAA, PPAOS, PPA-other, and bvFTD. The second cluster captured mostly temporal abnormalities and included mainly patients with svPPA and rtvFTD, but also bvFTD, AOS-PAA, and PPA-other. The third cluster captured cortical and subcortical atrophy, particularly in the midbrain, and included atypical Parkinsonian syndromes, with all PSP and CBS patients captured in this cluster, as well as most PPAOS patients. Considerable overlap of clinical syndromes was noted across these clusters, whereby patients with AOS-PAA, svPPA, PPA-other, and bvFTD were captured in more than one cluster. DISCUSSION: Our findings highlight heterogeneity in FTD, which mainly exists along three axes: speech, language and behavioral deficits reflecting frontal atrophy, language deficits reflecting temporal atrophy, and motor and motor speech deficits reflecting mostly midbrain and subcortical atrophy, with cortical involvement.

Score Breakdown

AI Score
-
Base Score
-
Rank Score
-
Narrative Velocity
-
AI Confidence
-
Neurocompute Parkinson’s Narrative Velocity Infographic
NEUROCOMPUTE VISUAL SYSTEM

Open the Narrative Velocity Map

Explore the full Parkinson’s research intelligence diagram.

Expand Intelligence View →
Full Neurocompute Infographic
Full Neurocompute Infographic