← Back to all signals
RESEARCH PAPER ANALYSIS

DNA Methylation-Based Classification for Central Nervous System Tumours: A Health Technology Assessment.

AI interpretation is pending for this paper.

Open original publication →
PMID41312229
JournalOntario health technology assessment series
Publication Date2025-11-06
Ingested2026-08-02 12:03 AM
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

What the AI sees

Not AI summarized yet.

WHY IT MATTERS

Research significance

Pending deeper interpretation.

ABSTRACT

Source abstract

BACKGROUND: Central nervous system (CNS) tumours occur when abnormal cells form in the tissues of the brain and/or spinal cord. Conventional testing for CNS tumour classification involves histopathological evaluation and molecular markers. More recently, DNA methylation-based classifier tests are being used as an adjunct tool in addition to conventional tests to help with CNS tumour classification. We conducted a health technology assessment of DNA methylation-based classifier tests for CNS tumours, which included an evaluation of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact of publicly funding DNA methylation-based classifier tests for CNS tumours. After considering the likely effects of testing on the patient experience, we determined not to perform an analysis of patient preferences and values. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search of the clinical evidence. We assessed the risk of bias of each included study using the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies (RoBANS) and the quality of the body of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria.We performed a systematic economic literature search and developed a decision-analytic model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using DNA methylation-based classifier tests. We also analyzed the budget impact of publicly funding DNA methylation-based classifier tests. All costs were expressed in 2024 CAD. RESULTS: We included 38 studies in the clinical evidence review. Compared with conventional testing alone, DNA methylation-based classifier tests are an adjunct tool that may improve CNS tumour classification (GRADE: Moderate). The tests may improve downstream patient outcomes, although the evidence is very uncertain (GRADE: Very low). Unclassifiable test results may increase time to treatment, but the evidence is very uncertain (GRADE: Very low).We did not identify any studies that met the inclusion criteria for our economic literature review. We estimated that there were about 716 patients with challenging diagnostic primary CNS tumours in Ontario each year. The cost of clinical-based DNA methylation profiling for CNS tumours was $1,500 per patient. The annual incremental costs of second-tier DNA methylation classifier tests (after the use of conventional test) would be $1,074,738 for all challenging diagnostic cases, and DNA methylation-based classifier tests improved the diagnosis for 195 patients. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER; i.e., the incremental cost per case with an improvement in primary CNS tumour classification) was $5,521. Scenario analyses showed that for children aged 0 to 14 years, the ICER was reduced to $2,683. Publicly funding second-tier DNA methylation-based classifier testing for challenging diagnostic cases of primary CNS tumours would result in a budget increase of about $1 million per year, with total additional costs of about $5.4 million over 5 years to test 3,600 patients. The budget increase for funding subgroup populations (e.g., children, patients with malignant tumours) would be smaller. If DNA methylation-based classifiers are used as first-tier tests for all patients with newly diagnosed primary CNS tumours, the additional funding costs would be about $4 million per year, with total additional funding costs of about $21 million over the initial 5-year period. CONCLUSIONS: DNA methylation-based classifier tests are an adjunct tool that may improve CNS tumour classification compared with conventional testing alone. Given that there are no empirical willingness-to-pay thresholds for an improvement in primary CNS tumour classification, the cost-effectiveness of DNA methylation-based classifier cannot be determined. Publicly funding second-tier DNA methylation-based classifier tests for challenging diagnostic primary CNS tumours would result in a total budget increase of about $5.4 million over 5 years. Public funding DNA methylation-based classifiers as first-tier tests for all patients with newly diagnosed primary CNS tumours would result in total budget increase of around $21 million over the next 5 years.

SUPPORTING PAPER SET

32 more papers to review

Ranked by current scoring engine
1 Nasopharyngeal Branchial Cleft Cyst in an Elderly Man: An Atypical Presentation. Iranian journal of otorhinolaryngology 55.5 2 A Cross-Sectional Study of Women's Cervical Cancer Knowledge and Acceptance of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in Makeni, Sierra Leone. Journal of health care for the poor and underserved 59.5 3 Correction to: The effect of centralized care on the management of postoperative fluctuations in plasma sodium concentration after pediatric suprasellar brain tumor surgery. Pituitary 47.5 4 Tumor Number and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score as Selection Criteria for Resection or Embolization of Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) 57.2 5 Engineered flavonoid disrupts mitochondrial AIF/CHCHD4 complex for targeted cancer therapy. Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B 55.54 6 Clinical Characteristics and Long-Term Follow-Up of Leukoencephalopathy in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia After Chemotherapy. Cancer management and research 65.84 7 Sex and age at exposure influence 131I biodistribution and dosimetry in Sprague-Dawley rats. Biology of sex differences 62.3 8 Distress Screening and Pediatric Palliative Care Referral: A Retrospective Case-Control Study in Supportive Cancer Care Delivery. Journal of palliative medicine 67.0 9 A qualitative study exploring the pros and cons of universal pediatric palliative care referral at diagnosis for children with cancer - CORRIGENDUM. Palliative & supportive care 47.5 10 Anesthesia in the Ophthalmology Clinic for Infants Younger Than 1 Year Undergoing Retinoblastoma Treatment. Review of 888 Cases. Paediatric anaesthesia 69.74 11 Comprehensive In Vitro Profiling Demonstrates Successful Immune Evasion of Bioengineered Immune-Shielded Heart Valves. Advanced healthcare materials 50.7 12 Comparative Effectiveness of Antibiotic Prophylaxis Regimens in Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Pediatric blood & cancer 64.3 13 The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Childhood Cancer Survival: A Population-Based Assessment of Survival Patterns Between 2015 and 2023 in Germany. Pediatric blood & cancer 69.52 14 A Phase I/II Trial of Anti-CD22/CD19 CAR-T Cell Therapy, CART2219.1, in Adult and Pediatric Relapsed/Refractory B-ALL. Blood cancer discovery 85.96 15 Radiomics and machine learning for differentiating pediatric intramedullary spinal tumors: a pilot study. European radiology experimental 65.0 16 Intracranial germ cell tumors: an underrecognized diagnostic consideration in adults with sellar/suprasellar lesions. Journal of neuro-oncology 65.5 17 Psychosocial interventions for children and adolescents across the cancer care continuum: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer 83.5 18 Ovarian Dysfunction After Gonadotoxic Therapy in Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Study From a Resource-Limited Setting. Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology 68.34 19 Self-Efficacy and Knowledge in Cardiotoxicity Management Among Pediatric Oncology Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Mediation Analysis. Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology 63.02 20 Derivation of a dose descriptor for the internal exposure to benzene. International journal of hygiene and environmental health 58.62 21 From childhood trauma to adult health: The association between adverse childhood experiences and preventive healthcare screenings. Journal of epidemiology and population health 38.5 22 Pyroptosis-Related Pathways and Their Impact on Immune Microenvironment Remodeling in Pediatric Ovarian and Adnexal Tumors. Experimental cell research 55.3 23 Expanding Horizons in Fertility Preservation: Diverse Populations, Emerging Indications, and Ethical Considerations. Fertility and sterility 62.8 24 Herbal medicine among vulnerable populations in Cameroon: a systematic review and meta-analysis with clinical, mechanistic, and global health perspectives. Journal of ethnopharmacology 74.0 25 Diagnostic accuracy of growth hormone stimulation tests for growth hormone deficiency following radiotherapy involving the hypothalamic-pituitary axis: protocol for a systematic review and planned meta-analysis. BMJ open 84.74 26 Asynchronous bilateral pulmonary pathology: left-sided congenital pulmonary airway malformation with contralateral malignant pleuropulmonary blastoma in an adolescent. BMJ case reports 58.4 27 Hereditary TTP and Hemolytic Anemia in Newborns. Pediatrics 60.9 28 Thymic age and peripheral residence time determine antitumor competence of CD8+ T cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 58.4 29 Population Pharmacokinetics of Topical Timolol Maleate Gel in Healthy Volunteers and Infants With Superficial Infantile Hemangioma. CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology 75.9 30 Global Trends in Sun Safety and Skin Cancer Prevention Education Among Adolescents: A Bibliometric Analysis. Cureus 58.0 31 Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Early Pulmonary Metastasis Risk in Osteosarcoma. Cancer medicine 66.3 32 Financial toxicity among families of children with cancer: a qualitative systematic review and meta-aggregation. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer 77.52
PATIENT-FRIENDLY SUMMARY

DNA Methylation-Based Classification for Central Nervous System Tumours: A Health Technology Assessment.

For education only—not personal medical advice.

Before you continue

AI-assisted research information

Neurocompute uses AI to summarize scientific papers, interpret research signals, and suggest relevant reference links. AI-generated content can be incomplete, misleading, or wrong, and generated links may be irrelevant or unavailable.

Our reviewed outputs have performed strongly to date, but past accuracy is not a guarantee. Verify summaries, scores, claims, and links against the original publication before relying on them.

This platform is for research and education only. It does not provide medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, or clinical guidance.

Pediatric cancer research intelligence graphic
PEDIATRIC CANCER VISUAL SYSTEM

Open the Research Intelligence Map

Explore the active pediatric oncology analysis view.

Expand Intelligence View →
Full Pediatric cancer research intelligence graphic