Asparaginase-Based Treatment Modifications and their effect on Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Outcomes: A Single-Center Experience.
AI interpretation is pending for this paper.
Open original publication →What the AI sees
Not AI summarized yet.
Research significance
Pending deeper interpretation.
Source abstract
BACKGROUND: Asparaginase is essential in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) therapy, but toxicity frequently necessitates formulation switching or discontinuation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center study of 313 children with ALL treated according to the BFM based protocols between January 2009 and January 2024. Three asparaginase preparations were used: native E. coli L-asparaginase, pegylated E. coli asparaginase, and Erwinia chrysanthemi asparaginase. We evaluated formulation changes or discontinuation, their causes, and their impact on event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). To avoid reverse causation, patients unable to complete asparaginase because of an early event (induction death or refractory disease) were analyzed separately. The remaining patients were grouped as standard complete treatment, drug shortage or toxicity- related formulation switch with complete dose, drug shortage or toxicity-related discontinuation. RESULTS: The median age was 6.9 years; 58.1% were male; 86.6% had B-cell and 13.4% T-cell ALL. Asparaginase formulation change occurred in 78 patients (24.9%), increasing across risk groups (standard 4.0%, intermediate 15.4%, high 42.9%), most often due to hypersensitivity (64 patients, 20.4%). After a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 5-year OS and EFS for the whole cohort were 87.4% and 81.6%, respectively. Among 302 evaluable patients, 5-year EFS was 83.1% in the standard complete treatment group, 93.8% in the formulation-switch group, and 69.1% in the incomplete treatment group (3-group p=0.027); the corresponding 5-year CIR was 13.3%, 2.2%, and 15.9%. Formulation switch with preserved dose was not associated with inferior EFS (adjusted HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.77), and discontinuation showed a numerically lower EFS that was not statistically significant (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.36-2.91). CONCLUSION: Formulation switching with preserved total cumulative exposure did not compromise outcomes, supporting the safety of substituting alternative preparations to maintain asparaginase exposure. Incomplete treatment showed a non-significant trend toward inferior EFS that warrants confirmation in larger cohorts. Ensuring access to alternative asparaginase formulations is critical, particularly where drug supply is constrained.